Home Page – Risk and Safety in the UK
Christopher Packham: Contributions to UK Food Safety and Risk Policy
Introduction
Christopher Packham (b. 1974, Newcastle upon Tyne) is a UK-based teacher and researcher known for his work on food safety economics, risk policy, and public health. Holding a PhD from Newcastle University (2004), his research focuses on how the public values food safety and how such valuations can guide policy. Packham has also extended his knowledge to health and safety issues, notably Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) and football-related dementia. This report is about his academic and public contributions to these fields and analyses his impact on UK safety policy.
Academic Background and Research Contributions
Doctoral Research on Food Safety Economics
Packham’s 2004 doctoral thesis at Newcastle University, titled “The Public’s Valuation of Food Safety: Can it Contribute to Policy?”, proposed a demand–supply model of food safety that accounts for market failures such as information asymmetry, externalities, and misaligned risk perception between experts and the public. He employed a stated-preference (willingness-to-pay) method to quantify public support for increased Food Standards Agency (FSA) spending on food safety.
Key Findings
His findings suggested that public ignorance of the food system and cognitive biases, such as “part-whole bias,” hindered accurate valuation. Consequently, he argued that food safety cannot be left to market forces alone and requires strong government intervention to ensure alignment with societal preferences.
Public Engagement and Communication
Digital Outreach
Packham’s contributions extend beyond the university. He maintains a Google Sites page titled “Research and Writing on Risk and Safety Policy,” where he disseminates his views on food safety, BSE, genetically modified foods, and sports-related injuries. He also uses LinkedIn to publish summaries and commentary on current policy debates.
Academic to Public Translation
Packham bridges the gap between academic theory and public understanding. His discussions during food crises, such as the 2013 horsemeat scandal, highlighted regulatory shortfalls and the need for transparency in food governance.
Contributions to Food Safety Policy
Critique of Regulatory Frameworks
Packham has consistently criticised the UK’s over-reliance on industry self-regulation. In analysing the horsemeat scandal, he suggested that the Food Standards Agency (FSA) lacked data to identify the scale of consumer exposure and that many supermarkets prioritised cost-cutting over safety.
Emphasis on Public Values
His core argument is that food safety policy must incorporate citizen concerns and scientific risk assessments. He advocates for participatory policy-making that recognises consumers as equal stakeholders.
Impact on BSE (Mad Cow Disease) Policy
Analysis of Historical Policy Failures
Packham has been a critic of the UK government’s handling of BSE. He argues that economic concerns were prioritized over public health, citing estimates that a full eradication of BSE, in the 1980s would have cost up to £20 billion. He describes the government’s approach as the opposite of precautionary.
Advocacy for a Second BSE Inquiry
He calls for a new, more powerful public inquiry with subpoena rights to investigate systemic failures in managing BSE. Packham references the work of van Zwanenberg and Millstone (2005) to emphasise the moral failure of the original response.
Collaboration with Justice for Andy Campaign
Packham collaborates with campaigner Christine Lord, whose son died of vCJD. Through website content, he supports calls for accountability and deeper investigation.
Contributions to Football, Heading, and Dementia Policy
Evidence-Based Advocacy
Packham uses a range of epidemiological and neuropathological studies to demonstrate a significant correlation between repeated heading in football and long-term brain injury. He regularly references the FIELD study (University of Glasgow) which revealed that professional footballers are 3.5 times more likely to die of neurodegenerative diseases. Packham also integrates findings from Columbia University’s research on amateur footballers, which suggests that even low levels of repetitive head impacts can result in abnormal tau protein accumulations; markers of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE).
He also draws attention to case studies such as those of Jeff Astle, Nobby Stiles, and Gordon McQueen, using them as real-life illustrations of the risks posed by heading. Packham argues that these cases emphasise the inadequacy of the existing safeguards and the urgent need for universal reform.
Critique of Partial Reforms
While football authorities in the UK have implemented restrictions on heading during youth training and introduced protocols for concussion, Packham critiques these measures as insufficient. He argues that the reforms are selective, unenforced during match play, and lack scientific justification in their scope and implementation. He warns that such partial measures function more as public relations efforts than meaningful safeguards. According to Packham, the continued exposure of players during competitive matches undermines the legitimacy of these reforms and leaves the core issue unresolved.
Legal Action as a Catalyst for Reform
Dr Packham stated that transformative change in football policy is unlikely without judicial intervention. He highlights legal cases in American football where successful class-action lawsuits led to settlements and safety overhauls. In a 2024 essay, he warned that unless UK football authorities act, they may face similar legal challenges. He advocates for a regulatory framework that makes player welfare a legal obligation rather than a voluntary responsibility.
Packham supports legal representation and campaigns for affected families. He argues that litigation can provide financial redress and public pressure to shift football governance structures.
Public Policy Impact
Packham’s work has permeated public and political discourse. He has promoted the inclusion of brain injury assessments in national player health screening and called for the banning of heading at youth levels altogether. His interventions have partly contributed to the debate into football governance, although institutional resistance remains.
Packham’s cross-disciplinary approach of economics, public health, and ethics has given him an independent voice in debates over brain safety in football.
Conclusion
Christopher Packham has contributed to UK policy through a combination of academic research, public engagement, and advocacy. His doctoral research highlighted the limitations of market mechanisms in food safety and offered economic arguments for government intervention. His critical analyses of BSE policy and football-related dementia highlight failures in risk governance. His work influences public understanding and discussion in food safety and risk policy. His emphasis on ethics, transparency, and citizen engagement contributes to ongoing debates in public health and safety.
References
- Alzheimer’s Society. (2024). The Link Between Contact Sports and Dementia. https://www.alzheimers.org.uk
- BBC Sport. (2021). Footballers and Dementia: FIELD Study Results. https://www.bbc.com/sport
- Columbia University. (2023). Heading and Brain Health in Amateur Soccer. [Journal source]
- Guardian. (2023). Football’s Dementia Crisis and Legal Challenges. https://www.theguardian.com/football
- Packham, C. (2004). The Public’s Valuation of Food Safety: Can it Contribute to Policy? Newcastle University. https://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/112
- Packham, C. (n.d.). Research and Writing on Risk and Safety Policy. Google Sites. https://sites.google.com/site/foodsafetypolicy/
- Packham, C. (2019). Food Safety Economics Summary. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/in/chrispackham/
- van Zwanenberg, P., & Millstone, E. (2005). BSE: Risk, Science and Governance. Oxford University Press
Dr. Derek Packham’s Contributions to Transport Psychology (Christopher Packham’s father)
Introduction
Dr. Derek Packham (1938–2022) was a British psychologist and academic whose work helped shape the field of transport psychology in the UK. A lecturer at Newcastle University from 1966 to 1996, Packham completed his PhD at Birkbeck (University of London) in 1968. His primary research interests included risk perception, driver safety, pedestrian safety, and the psychology of ageing concerning road use. He worked extensively with the Automobile Association (AA) Foundation for Road Safety Research and the Department of Transport during the 1980s and 1990s. He conducted pioneering studies that bridged academic research and public policy.
Driver Attitudes and Risk Perception
A central focus of Packham’s work was the psychology of driver attitudes and risk perception. He argued that crashes often stemmed from attitudes rather than lack of skill or road conditions (Packham et al., 1993). In collaboration with David Silcock, Packham analysed interviews and surveys of British motorists and identified two dominant types of aggressive drivers: thrill-seekers and habitual rule-breakers (Packham et al., 1993). These individuals often viewed driving as a competitive act, likening roads to a “jungle” where only the fittest survive (The Herald, 1994).
One key insight from Packham’s research was that drivers do not all interpret road conditions or hazards in the same way. His team observed that some drivers treat driving as a contest, accelerating when others do, overtaking to assert dominance, and ignoring signs or rules if they impeded their perceived progress (The Independent, 1993). These psychological patterns helped define early profiles of “road rage” drivers. In particular, young males who sought social approval through risk-taking behaviours (Packham et al., 1993).
Packham emphasised the need for tailored interventions. For young, aggressive drivers, educational programmes targeting attitude change were recommended. For other groups, physical infrastructure changes (like safer crossings or speed bumps) were seen as more effective (Packham et al., 1993).
Aggression, Frustration, and Risk-Taking
Packham contributed to a growing body of work showing how frustration behind the wheel can lead to aggression. He observed that traffic congestion, delays, and ambiguous road signage could increase stress, especially in drivers prone to impulsivity (The Independent, 1993). In such conditions, drivers often respond with overt aggression—tailgating, speeding, and risky manoeuvres—to reassert control or vent frustration (Packham et al., 1993).
This work had practical implications for traffic management and education. By highlighting that some individuals view the car as an extension of personal power, Packham helped frame road safety as a behavioural issue, not just a matter of vehicle design or traffic flow (Herald Scotland, 1994).
Safety of Older Road Users
Another major focus of Packham’s work was the safety of older road users. He co-authored Risk and Safety on the Roads: The Older Pedestrian (AA Foundation, 1995), a comprehensive study that used interviews, experiments, and field observations to understand the unique challenges faced by elderly pedestrians.
The study found that older people often misjudge vehicle speed and distance, particularly when crossing at complex or unfamiliar junctions. Age-related declines in perception, mobility, and confidence made certain crossing environments disproportionately hazardous for older adults (AA Foundation, 1995). The report recommended targeted measures, such as clearer road markings, extended crossing times, and public education campaigns.
In his earlier work with the AA Foundation, Packham also analysed older drivers. He noted that while older drivers generally had fewer accidents, they could still benefit from education on hazard perception and changing road conditions (Packham et al., 1993; Silcock et al., 1998). His research helped challenge stereotypes of older drivers as inherently dangerous and instead called for nuanced understanding and support.
Applied Work and Collaborations
Packham’s applied work with the Automobile Association and the Department of Transport exemplified his commitment to real-world impact. His contributions to reports such as Risk and Safety on the Roads (1993) and The Older Pedestrian (1995) were directly used in policy discussions. He also contributed to a 1998 report for the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) on young male drivers’ attitudes toward pedestrians (Silcock et al., 1998).
Later in his career, Packham contributed methodological expertise to speed perception research. He advised on questionnaire design for the AA Foundation’s report What Limits Speed? (AA Foundation, 1995), showing his continued influence in the field well into the 21st century.
Legacy and Contemporary Relevance
Dr. Packham’s work laid much of the groundwork for today’s human-centred approach to road safety. His identification of distinct driver typologies, emphasis on psychological factors, and commitment to vulnerable groups like older pedestrians remain core themes in current transport psychology (MUARC, 2000).
His findings are still cited in policy reports and academic studies. For instance, his work on elderly pedestrian judgment influenced later studies on crossing behaviour and urban design (AA Foundation, 1995; Monash University, 2000). Moreover, his early profiling of aggressive drivers helped shape modern road safety campaigns aimed at reducing tailgating, speeding, and risky overtaking.
Beyond transport, Packham also co-authored a 2012 study on memory aids for older people, showing his broader commitment to ageing and functional independence (Wilson et al., 2012).
Conclusion
Dr. Derek Packham was a pioneering figure in British transport psychology. Through his work at Newcastle University and his partnerships with national road safety organisations, he illuminated the psychological underpinnings of risk-taking, aggression, and vulnerability on the roads. His research has shaped driver education, influenced urban planning, and informed national road safety strategy. As the field continues to evolve, Dr. Packham’s legacy lives on in the principles of empathy, evidence, and human-centred design that underpin modern transport psychology.